AI Course
Lesson 79: NLP Evaluation Metrics
Building an NLP model is only half the work. The other half is measuring how good the model actually is. NLP evaluation metrics help us understand whether a model is performing well or needs improvement.
Without proper evaluation, we cannot trust model outputs, especially in real-world applications like translation, sentiment analysis, or text generation.
Real-World Connection
When companies deploy chatbots, recommendation engines, or translation systems, they continuously evaluate model quality. Poor evaluation can lead to wrong decisions, customer dissatisfaction, or even legal risks.
Evaluation metrics act like performance reports for AI models.
Why Evaluation Is Important in NLP
Natural language is complex and subjective. Two answers can both look reasonable but differ in quality. Evaluation metrics help quantify this quality in a measurable way.
- Compare different models
- Track improvements over time
- Detect model degradation
Common NLP Evaluation Metrics
Different NLP tasks use different metrics. There is no single metric that fits all tasks.
Accuracy
Accuracy measures how many predictions were correct out of the total predictions. It is commonly used in classification tasks.
accuracy = correct_predictions / total_predictions
print(accuracy)
Precision and Recall
Precision measures how many predicted positives were actually correct. Recall measures how many actual positives were successfully identified.
These metrics are especially important in tasks like spam detection or medical text analysis.
F1 Score
The F1 score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall. It balances both metrics into a single score.
from sklearn.metrics import f1_score
y_true = [1, 0, 1, 1]
y_pred = [1, 0, 0, 1]
print(f1_score(y_true, y_pred))
Metrics for Text Generation and Translation
For tasks like machine translation and text generation, exact matching is not reliable. Instead, similarity-based metrics are used.
BLEU Score
BLEU measures how similar generated text is to a reference translation based on overlapping word sequences.
- Higher BLEU score indicates better translation quality
- Widely used in machine translation
ROUGE Score
ROUGE measures overlap between generated text and reference text. It is commonly used in summarization tasks.
Human Evaluation
Automatic metrics cannot fully capture meaning, tone, or correctness. Human evaluation is often used alongside automated metrics to judge fluency, relevance, and coherence.
In production systems, both human and automated evaluations are combined.
Challenges in NLP Evaluation
- Multiple correct answers for the same input
- Context-dependent quality
- Bias in evaluation datasets
Choosing the right metric is critical for building reliable NLP systems.
Practice Questions
Practice 1: What do NLP evaluation metrics measure?
Practice 2: Which metric balances precision and recall?
Practice 3: Which metric is commonly used for translation evaluation?
Quick Quiz
Quiz 1: Which metric measures correctness of positive predictions?
Quiz 2: Which metric is used for summarization tasks?
Quiz 3: What complements automatic NLP metrics?
Coming up next: NLP Use Cases — how NLP is applied across industries in real-world systems.