AI Lesson 79 – NLP Evaluation Metrics | Dataplexa

Lesson 79: NLP Evaluation Metrics

Building an NLP model is only half the work. The other half is measuring how good the model actually is. NLP evaluation metrics help us understand whether a model is performing well or needs improvement.

Without proper evaluation, we cannot trust model outputs, especially in real-world applications like translation, sentiment analysis, or text generation.

Real-World Connection

When companies deploy chatbots, recommendation engines, or translation systems, they continuously evaluate model quality. Poor evaluation can lead to wrong decisions, customer dissatisfaction, or even legal risks.

Evaluation metrics act like performance reports for AI models.

Why Evaluation Is Important in NLP

Natural language is complex and subjective. Two answers can both look reasonable but differ in quality. Evaluation metrics help quantify this quality in a measurable way.

  • Compare different models
  • Track improvements over time
  • Detect model degradation

Common NLP Evaluation Metrics

Different NLP tasks use different metrics. There is no single metric that fits all tasks.

Accuracy

Accuracy measures how many predictions were correct out of the total predictions. It is commonly used in classification tasks.


accuracy = correct_predictions / total_predictions
print(accuracy)
  

Precision and Recall

Precision measures how many predicted positives were actually correct. Recall measures how many actual positives were successfully identified.

These metrics are especially important in tasks like spam detection or medical text analysis.

F1 Score

The F1 score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall. It balances both metrics into a single score.


from sklearn.metrics import f1_score

y_true = [1, 0, 1, 1]
y_pred = [1, 0, 0, 1]

print(f1_score(y_true, y_pred))
  
0.80

Metrics for Text Generation and Translation

For tasks like machine translation and text generation, exact matching is not reliable. Instead, similarity-based metrics are used.

BLEU Score

BLEU measures how similar generated text is to a reference translation based on overlapping word sequences.

  • Higher BLEU score indicates better translation quality
  • Widely used in machine translation

ROUGE Score

ROUGE measures overlap between generated text and reference text. It is commonly used in summarization tasks.

Human Evaluation

Automatic metrics cannot fully capture meaning, tone, or correctness. Human evaluation is often used alongside automated metrics to judge fluency, relevance, and coherence.

In production systems, both human and automated evaluations are combined.

Challenges in NLP Evaluation

  • Multiple correct answers for the same input
  • Context-dependent quality
  • Bias in evaluation datasets

Choosing the right metric is critical for building reliable NLP systems.

Practice Questions

Practice 1: What do NLP evaluation metrics measure?



Practice 2: Which metric balances precision and recall?



Practice 3: Which metric is commonly used for translation evaluation?



Quick Quiz

Quiz 1: Which metric measures correctness of positive predictions?





Quiz 2: Which metric is used for summarization tasks?





Quiz 3: What complements automatic NLP metrics?





Coming up next: NLP Use Cases — how NLP is applied across industries in real-world systems.